Citing to Unpublished Opinions

Thanks to Westlaw and Lexis, attorneys practicing in federal courts have access unpublished district court opinions.  Because they are so numerous, you will often find that an unpublished case addresses a relevant factual or legal issue, but not a published decision.  Sometimes, it seems, you can find an unpublished district court opinion that says just about anything.  This entry discusses how the opinions should be cited; and because the official citation format has some drawback, I offer some common sense observations about when you may want to use use a shortened form.


The Official Citation.

Generally, the legal citation authorities recommend that citations to unpublished legal opinions include case name, case number(a.k.a. docket number), online citation (i.e., the database ID), pin cite, court and full date.  (Link, Link.)

For example:

Long v. DHS, No. 14-807, 2015 WL 3961312, *3 (D.D.C. June 29, 2015)

A few points:

  • Case name is underlined or italicized.
  • Use a * (star) before the page number because the reference is not to a consecutively bound book, but to a document that begins on page *1.  The star tells us that the cited information is on *x of the original slip opinion, not the page of the onscreen or printed database entry.
  • The case number is often called the docket number, meaning the unique identifying number assigned to the proceeding in the particular court, usually a combination of year the action was filed, judges initials, type of matter and how many cases were filed before it that year.  (I dislike the term “docket number” confusing, because I use “docket number” to refer to a number assigned to a specific document filed with the court appearing on the “register of action”.  (Link.))
  • The use of the case number and full date would help someone find the slip opinion if they did not have online access, and instead wanted to head to the court and look up the document manually or go to the Court’s website to find the opinion, if it is available there.

Using Full Citations to Unpublished Opinions on Westlaw and Lexis US District Court Decisions in Federal Court Papers Is a Waste of Time.

Often, the full citation is not helpful, has drawbacks and may undermine the credibility of your authority.  Instead, I suggest that attorneys omit the case number entirely and use only the year.  Don’t follow my advice, however, if your audience (i.e. the Judge) insists on strict blue book citations or doesn’t have access to the databases.

Generally, and especially in USDCs, judges and their clerks pull the decision from Westlaw or Lexis by typing the ID number.  The case number and the full date are not going to help and only get in the way.  The problems are many:  the extra information adds length to the citation, taking up more room in your brief and breaking the train of thought of the reader; draws attention to minutia, which is mentally wearing on your audience; cite checking takes longer; using them will cost your client money and slow down the drafting process; and there’s more opportunity for errors.  The full citation draws additional attention to the fact that you are relying on an unpublished opinion:  the court will think obscure, foreign and different, weak authority – compared to safe and authoritative opinions the court is comfortable to rely on.  The judge is probably going to think this anyway, but why highlight the fact?

You need the year, so that the court can quickly determine if the case is recent.  The Westlaw/Lexis citation is enough to let the judge know that the case is not in an official reporter.  If the case was decided last month, you might want to give the full date, just to let the judge know this is really the latest in jurisprudence (although I doubt it is going to make a difference and if it did, you’d be better off discussing the fact in text).

Unless you are still writing for your 1L legal writing instructor, save your time, reduce errors, shorten your brief, and avoid undermining your persuasiveness by providing citations with the relevant information.


  1. Pingback: viagra dosage
  2. Pingback: cialis on line
  3. Pingback: cialis 5mg
  4. Pingback: Viagra mail order
  5. Pingback: Buy branded viagra
  6. Pingback: online buy cialis
  7. Pingback: cipro
  8. Pingback: price of cialis
  9. Pingback: viagra samples
  10. Pingback: careprost eyelash
  11. Pingback: viagra for sale
  12. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  13. Pingback: generic ed pills
  14. Pingback: chloroquin
  15. Pingback: pills for ed
  16. Pingback: canada pharmacy
  17. Pingback: generic cialis
  18. Pingback: Cialis in usa
  19. Pingback: levitra vardenafil
  20. Pingback: generic levitra
  21. Pingback: levitra usa
  22. Pingback: cialis online
  23. Pingback: slot games
  24. Pingback: free slots online
  25. Pingback: lumigan price
  26. Pingback: cheap cialis
  27. Pingback: loans online
  28. Pingback: online loans
  29. Pingback: parx casino online
  30. Pingback: loan online
  31. Pingback: Nootropic stacks
  32. Pingback: viagra cost
  33. Pingback: lose weight fast
  34. Pingback: Google
  35. Pingback: cialis internet
  36. Pingback: buy viagra 100mg
  37. Pingback: cialis internet
  38. Pingback: 20 cialis
  39. Pingback: CBD for sale
  40. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  41. Pingback: عزة
  42. Pingback: حلوه خيال
  43. Pingback: Escort amsterdam
  44. Pingback: Kratom near me
  45. Pingback: cialis internet
  46. Pingback: Royal CBD
  47. Pingback: local guides
  48. Pingback: Royal CBD
  49. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  50. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  51. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  52. Pingback:
  53. Pingback: rivers casino
  54. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  55. Pingback: cbd oil wyoming
  56. Pingback: Royal CBD
  57. Pingback: wisconsin cbd
  58. Pingback: washington dc cbd
  59. Pingback: virginia
  60. Pingback: cbd oil vermont
  61. Pingback: Royal CBD
  62. Pingback:
  63. Pingback: Royal CBD
  64. Pingback: texas
  65. Pingback:
  66. Pingback: oregon
  67. Pingback: cbd rhode island
  68. Pingback:
  69. Pingback: cbd oil new york
  70. Pingback: cbd oil new mexico
  71. Pingback: cbd new hampshire
  72. Pingback: nevada
  73. Pingback: Royal CBD
  74. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  75. Pingback: cbd oil minnesota
  76. Pingback: Royal CBD
  77. Pingback: massachusetts
  78. Pingback: cbd kentucky
  79. Pingback: cbd maine
  80. Pingback: iowa cbd
  81. Pingback: illinois
  82. Pingback: Royal CBD
  83. Pingback:
  84. Pingback:
  85. Pingback: Royal CBD
  86. Pingback: Royal CBD
  87. Pingback: alabama
  88. Pingback: Royal CBD
  89. Pingback:
  90. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  91. Pingback: Royal CBD
  92. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  93. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  94. Pingback: RoyalCBD
  95. Pingback:
  96. Pingback: cbd legal status
  97. Pingback:
  98. Pingback: how does cbd work
  99. Pingback: Royal CBD
  100. Pingback: Juul Pods
  101. Pingback: اغاني
  102. Pingback: lesbian porn
  103. Pingback: MILF
  104. Pingback: slots online
  106. Pingback: viagra buy
  107. Pingback: Electrician SEO
  108. Pingback: app for pc
  109. Pingback: Kabza De Small
  110. Pingback: Escort amsterdam
  111. Pingback: Budapest escorts
  112. Pingback: Health Coaches
  113. Pingback: anvelope chisinau
  114. Pingback: Online Impacts
  115. Pingback: options trading
  116. Pingback: Laptop reparatur
  117. Pingback: affiliate link
  118. Pingback: Buy weed online
  119. Pingback: thc vape cartridge
  120. Pingback: buy cialis
  121. Pingback: Escorts amsterdam
  122. Pingback: Laptop hilfe
  123. Pingback: travel
  124. Pingback: Stage Hypnotist
  125. Pingback: loose yoga tops
  126. Pingback: vacation
  127. Pingback: terriers
  128. Pingback: Buy Meth Online
  129. Pingback: اغاني
  130. Pingback: buy finasteride
  131. Pingback: viagra
  132. Pingback: viagra
  133. Pingback: Venice photography
  134. Pingback: CANADA PNP PROGRAM
  135. Pingback: Employee benefits
  136. Pingback: sildenafil
  137. Pingback: Top 3 Thai
  138. Pingback:

Comments are closed.